On 6/5/25 07:27, Jiri Slaby wrote: > Reverting this gives me back to normal sizes. > > Any ideas?
I don't see any reason not to revert it. The benefits weren't exactly clear from the changelogs or cover letter. Enabling "various compiler checks" doesn't exactly scream that this is critical to end users in some way. The only question is if we revert just this last patch or the whole series. Uros, is there an alternative to reverting?
