Hello, Omar.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:14:44PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > wake_index = atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index);
> > for (i = 0; i < SBQ_WAIT_QUEUES; i++) {
> > struct sbq_wait_state *ws = &sbq->ws[wake_index];
>
> So I think we want a patch for the test_and_set_bit_lock() and
> clear_bit_unlock(), but the rest should stay as-is.Yeah, that makes sense to me. Would you be interested in updating the patch? Thanks. -- tejun
