On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 04:42:09PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 08:31 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > I'm assuming that Martin will eventually queue this up. But probably > > for 4.17, then we can always flag it for a backport to stable once > > it's been thoroughly tested. > > Jens, thanks for reply. > > I wonder if folks agree that in this case we should revert > > 84676c1f21e8 genirq/affinity: assign vectors to all possible CPUs > > for v4.16.
Even 84676c1f21e8 is reverted, IO failure or hang can still be triggered easily when doing CPU online/offline test. So this patchset is really needed. Thanks, Ming
