On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 08:27 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > I am not sure this is going to work for SCSI parallel; we're using the > QUIESCE state there to do domain validation, and all commands there are > most definitely not PM requests. > Can you please validate your patches with eg aic7xxx and SCSI parallel > disks?
Hello Hannes, How about using the RQF_PM flag for SCSI parallel requests instead of RQF_PREEMPT? That change will also avoid that RQF_PREEMPT has a double meaning. Anyway, I will see whether I can drop that change from this series and submit that change seperately. Thanks, Bart.
