> On 27 Feb 2019, at 12.14, Igor Konopko <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Currently when we fail on gc rq data allocation
> we simply skip the data which we wanted to move
> and finally move the line to free state and lose
> that data due to that. This patch move the data
> allocation to some earlier phase of GC, where we
> can still fail gracefully by moving line back
> to closed state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Konopko <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-gc.c | 19 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-gc.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-gc.c
> index 3feadfd9418d..31fc1339faa8 100644
> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-gc.c
> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-gc.c
> @@ -84,8 +84,6 @@ static void pblk_gc_line_ws(struct work_struct *work)
>       struct pblk_line_ws *gc_rq_ws = container_of(work,
>                                               struct pblk_line_ws, ws);
>       struct pblk *pblk = gc_rq_ws->pblk;
> -     struct nvm_tgt_dev *dev = pblk->dev;
> -     struct nvm_geo *geo = &dev->geo;
>       struct pblk_gc *gc = &pblk->gc;
>       struct pblk_line *line = gc_rq_ws->line;
>       struct pblk_gc_rq *gc_rq = gc_rq_ws->priv;
> @@ -93,13 +91,6 @@ static void pblk_gc_line_ws(struct work_struct *work)
> 
>       up(&gc->gc_sem);
> 
> -     gc_rq->data = vmalloc(array_size(gc_rq->nr_secs, geo->csecs));
> -     if (!gc_rq->data) {
> -             pblk_err(pblk, "could not GC line:%d (%d/%d)\n",
> -                                     line->id, *line->vsc, gc_rq->nr_secs);
> -             goto out;
> -     }
> -
>       /* Read from GC victim block */
>       ret = pblk_submit_read_gc(pblk, gc_rq);
>       if (ret) {
> @@ -189,6 +180,8 @@ static void pblk_gc_line_prepare_ws(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>       struct pblk_line *line = line_ws->line;
>       struct pblk_line_mgmt *l_mg = &pblk->l_mg;
>       struct pblk_line_meta *lm = &pblk->lm;
> +     struct nvm_tgt_dev *dev = pblk->dev;
> +     struct nvm_geo *geo = &dev->geo;
>       struct pblk_gc *gc = &pblk->gc;
>       struct pblk_line_ws *gc_rq_ws;
>       struct pblk_gc_rq *gc_rq;
> @@ -247,9 +240,13 @@ static void pblk_gc_line_prepare_ws(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>       gc_rq->nr_secs = nr_secs;
>       gc_rq->line = line;
> 
> +     gc_rq->data = vmalloc(gc_rq->nr_secs * geo->csecs);
> +     if (!gc_rq->data)
> +             goto fail_free_gc_rq;
> +
>       gc_rq_ws = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pblk_line_ws), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!gc_rq_ws)
> -             goto fail_free_gc_rq;
> +             goto fail_free_gc_data;
> 
>       gc_rq_ws->pblk = pblk;
>       gc_rq_ws->line = line;
> @@ -281,6 +278,8 @@ static void pblk_gc_line_prepare_ws(struct work_struct 
> *work)
> 
>       return;
> 
> +fail_free_gc_data:
> +     vfree(gc_rq->data);
> fail_free_gc_rq:
>       kfree(gc_rq);
> fail_free_lba_list:
> --
> 2.17.1

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Javier González <[email protected]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to