> On 4 Mar 2019, at 10.05, Hans Holmberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I strongly disagree with adding code that would mask implantation errors.
> 
> If we want more internal checks, we could add an if statement that
> would only be compiled in if CONFIG_NVM_PBLK_DEBUG is enabled.
> 

Not sure who this is for - better not to top post.

In any case, this is a spec grey zone. I’m ok with cleaning the bits as
they mean nothing for the reset command. If you feel that strongly about
this, you can take if with Igor.

> 
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:48 AM Javier González <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On 27 Feb 2019, at 18.14, Igor Konopko <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In current pblk implementation of erase command
>>> there is a chance tha sector bits are set to some
>>> random values for erase PPA. This is unexpected
>>> situation, since erase shall be always chunk
>>> aligned. This patch fixes that issue
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Igor Konopko <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c | 1 +
>>> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-map.c  | 2 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
>>> index a98b2255f963..78b1eea4ab67 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
>>> @@ -978,6 +978,7 @@ int pblk_line_erase(struct pblk *pblk, struct pblk_line 
>>> *line)
>>> 
>>>              ppa = pblk->luns[bit].bppa; /* set ch and lun */
>>>              ppa.a.blk = line->id;
>>> +             ppa.a.reserved = 0;
>>> 
>>>              atomic_dec(&line->left_eblks);
>>>              WARN_ON(test_and_set_bit(bit, line->erase_bitmap));
>>> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-map.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-map.c
>>> index 79df583ea709..aea46b4ec40f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-map.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-map.c
>>> @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ int pblk_map_erase_rq(struct pblk *pblk, struct nvm_rq 
>>> *rqd,
>>> 
>>>                      *erase_ppa = ppa_list[i];
>>>                      erase_ppa->a.blk = e_line->id;
>>> +                     erase_ppa->a.reserved = 0;
>>> 
>>>                      spin_unlock(&e_line->lock);
>>> 
>>> @@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ int pblk_map_erase_rq(struct pblk *pblk, struct nvm_rq 
>>> *rqd,
>>>              atomic_dec(&e_line->left_eblks);
>>>              *erase_ppa = pblk->luns[bit].bppa; /* set ch and lun */
>>>              erase_ppa->a.blk = e_line->id;
>>> +             erase_ppa->a.reserved = 0;
>>>      }
>>> 
>>>      return 0;
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>> 
>> I’m fine with adding this, but note that there is actually no
>> requirement for the erase to be chunk aligned - the only bits that
>> should be looked at are group, PU and chunk.
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Javier González <[email protected]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to