On 9/17/19 6:09 AM, xiu...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiu...@redhat.com>
> 
> Changed in V2:
> - Addressed the comment from Ming Lei, thanks.
> 
> Changed in V3:
> - Switch to memalloc_noio_save/restore from Christoph's comment, thanks.

This now seems to be a mix of both approaches, which I don't think makes
sense at all. I think we should just stick to the gfp_t being passed in,
and defining the standard mask for init time blk-mq memory allocations.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Reply via email to