On 2019/9/18 7:25, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 9/17/19 5:19 PM, Xiubo Li wrote:
On 2019/9/18 7:11, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 9/17/19 4:54 PM, Xiubo Li wrote:
On 2019/9/17 22:13, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 9/17/19 6:09 AM, xiu...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Xiubo Li <xiu...@redhat.com>
Changed in V2:
- Addressed the comment from Ming Lei, thanks.
Changed in V3:
- Switch to memalloc_noio_save/restore from Christoph's comment, thanks.
This now seems to be a mix of both approaches, which I don't think makes
sense at all. I think we should just stick to the gfp_t being passed in,
and defining the standard mask for init time blk-mq memory allocations.
Hmm, I might missed or misunderstand from the last thread. In this
thread with the save/store, the GFP_KERNEL is using instead. Maybe
save/store pair is not a exactly correct place or occasion to use here
as @Bart mentioned.
Just make them all gfp based please, and skip the memalloc() stuff.
Yeah, isn't the v2 thread needed here ?
It might be, I didn't look super closely at v2. I'll take a look.
Sure :-)
BRs
