On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:38:57 -0400
Chris Mason <chris.ma...@oracle.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 18:10 +0200, Ahmed Kamal wrote:
> > >  But now Oracle can re-license Solaris and merge ZFS with btrfs.
> > > Just kidding, I don't think it would be technically feasible.
> > >
> > 
> > May I suggest the name "ZbtrFS" :)
> > Sorry couldn't resist. On a more serious note though, is there any
> > technical benefits that justify continuing to push money in btrfs
> The short answer from my point of view is yes.  This doesn't really
> change the motivations for working on btrfs or the problems we're trying
> to solve.

... which sounds logical to me. From looking at the project for a while one
can see you are trying to solve problems that are not really linux' ones...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to