On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:38:57 -0400 Chris Mason <chris.ma...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 18:10 +0200, Ahmed Kamal wrote: > > > But now Oracle can re-license Solaris and merge ZFS with btrfs. > > > Just kidding, I don't think it would be technically feasible. > > > > > > > May I suggest the name "ZbtrFS" :) > > Sorry couldn't resist. On a more serious note though, is there any > > technical benefits that justify continuing to push money in btrfs > > The short answer from my point of view is yes. This doesn't really > change the motivations for working on btrfs or the problems we're trying > to solve. ... which sounds logical to me. From looking at the project for a while one can see you are trying to solve problems that are not really linux' ones... -- Regards, Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
