On Thursday 11 February 2010, Chris Mason wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 06:35:33PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > this is a follow-up of the previous email. I rewrite the btrfs command in C. > > Now the following actions are implemented: > > > > snapshot (-s) -> create a snapshot > > delete (-D) -> delete a subvolume or a snapshot > > create (-S) -> create a subvolume > > defrag (-d) -> defrag a tree or a file > > fssync (-c) -> sync a filesystem > > scan (-a) -> scan devices searching a btrfs filesystem > > show (-l) -> list the btrfs fs and its volumes > > balance (-b) -> balance the chunk across the volumes > > add-dev (-A) -> add a volume to a filesystem > > rem-dev (-R) -> remove a volume to a filesystem > > > > I cared that btrfs returns appropriate error code. And I check that a correct > > parameters number is passed. Finally, where appropriate if a subvolume is > > required (for example in case of snapshot and or delete) is checked that the > > passed path is a subvolume. This should limits the complain like: > > - I snapshot a sub directory, but I got a snapshot of the entire tree. > > > > I renamed remove (a volume) in rem-dev in order to avoid confusion with delete > > (a subvolume). > > Sorry for the late reply, but I really like this mode and will work on > integrating it. rem-dev should be rm-dev or remove-dev
For me is ok; I will update my patch this week end > -chris > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreij...@inwind.it> Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
