On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Martin Steigerwald <mar...@lichtvoll.de> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2011 schrieb Jeff Putney: >> > I do not argue that having a nice fsck sooner than later is fine, but >> > I question the usefulness of repeating reminders. Chris Mason and >> > other developers possibly working on the fsck should know by now, >> > that you want it. So its unlikely that "I want it too" is going to >> > change anything. >> >> I haven't gotten the impression that Chris is quite that tone deaf, or >> inconsiderate of the opinions of the community at large. And the >> discussion you are commenting on was about releasing the source code, >> not the completed tool. I don't think anyone is saying that Chris >> needs to work harder and finish it faster. What we are saying is that >> it would be better for the progress of btrfs in general if the >> development of fsck were done in an open way, and available for others >> to contribute to. The main problem with your statement of "Chris >> Mason and other developers..." is that there does not appear to be any >> other developers at all. That's what we'd most like to see changed. > > Fair enough, but once again you are repeating that wish. > > I pretty much bet that Chris Mason is aware of this wish of yours and > other people already and the reasons for that wish. I has been at least > expressed for a dozen times on this thread. > > So again what is another dozen of times trying to achieve? > > This all reminds my of childs that ask their parents when they will arrive > every 10 seconds.
If your driver keeps telling you that you're going to arrive in 10 seconds, and it takes a child to start asking questions, maybe you should pay more attention and realize you just might be gettin shanghaied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
