On 12-02-26 02:19 AM, Jérôme Poulin wrote: > > What would be interesting is getting an eye on btrfs fi df of your > filesystem to see what part is getting full, or maybe just do a > balance.
I did try a balance. As I had mentioned subsequently, I ended up having to grow the filesystem to 10x (somewhere between 20 and 50GB) it's data requirement in order to get that kernel headers .deb to unpack, and after it unpacked I was successful in shrinking back down to 5G, so it seems the problem was something worse than just "not ideal" metadata allocation. > I have been running 3.0.0 for quite a while without any problem, > metadata grew a bit too much (1.5 TB for 2 TB of data) and balance > fixed it back to 50 GB of metadata then 20 GB after deleting some > snapshots. Interesting data point, thanks. b.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
