> On: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 18:30:13 +0300 Konstantinos Skarlatos wrote > +1 from me too, i would save enormous amounts of space with a patch > like that, at least until dedupe is implemented. We could call it "poor > man's dedupe"
That's my point. This poor man's dedupe would solve my problems here very well. I don't need a zfs-variant of dedupe. I can implement such a file-based dedupe with userland tools and would be happy. It's there, it's tested, it doesn't break another thing. Use it! Greetings Norbert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
