On 06/21/2012 03:38 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> But if /boot has to be in a separate filesystem, which is the point to >> > support btrfs at all ? Does make sense to support only a subset of btrfs >> > features ? >> > > Yes, and that's another good reason for /boot: btrfs supports that kind > of policy (e.g. "no compression or encryption in this subtree.")
But what about large disk ? Syslinux is able to handle large disk ? Or it uses BIOS interrupt? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
