On 06/21/2012 10:05 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 03:38 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> But if /boot has to be in a separate filesystem, which is the point to
>>>> support btrfs at all ? Does make sense to support only a subset of btrfs
>>>> features ?
>>>>
>> Yes, and that's another good reason for /boot: btrfs supports that kind
>> of policy (e.g. "no compression or encryption in this subtree.")
>
> But what about large disk ? Syslinux is able to handle large disk ? Or
> it uses BIOS interrupt?
It uses the firmware.. how well the firmware can handle large disks is
another matter.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
