On 11/08/2012 06:31 PM, Stefan Behrens wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:50:19 +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
[...]
>> I think that so "replace" would be the natural extension to the "add"
>> and "delete" subcommands.
>
> "btrfs device replace <old> <new> <path>"
> was also my first idea. It used to be like this initially.
>
> "btrfs device replace cancel <path>"
> was the point when I gave up putting it below the "device" commands. IMO
> that's just too long, too much to type.
>
> Now it has the same look and feel as the "scrub" commands ("scrub
> start", "scrub status" and "scrub cancel").
Yes, but scrub was a a new command. Instead I see "replace" as an
extension of "btrfs device add/del" (from an user interface POV).
If someone would extend the "btrfs device delete" command to support
status/pause/resume, how could do it ?
May be we need a new series of command which handle the "background
process" (like btrfs replace, btrfs device delete, btrfs subvolume
delete....) to status/stop/suspend/resume these processes ?
I am doing a bit of brain-storming...
>
>
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
