On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:51:50PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Qu Wenruo (17): > btrfs: Cleanup the unused struct async_sched. > btrfs: Added btrfs_workqueue_struct implemented ordered execution > based on kernel workqueue > btrfs: Add high priority workqueue support for btrfs_workqueue_struct > btrfs: Add threshold workqueue based on kernel workqueue > btrfs: Replace fs_info->workers with btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Replace fs_info->delalloc_workers with btrfs_workqueue > btrfs: Replace fs_info->submit_workers with btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Replace fs_info->flush_workers with btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Replace fs_info->endio_* workqueue with btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Replace fs_info->rmw_workers workqueue with btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Replace fs_info->cache_workers workqueue with btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Replace fs_info->readahead_workers workqueue with > btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Replace fs_info->fixup_workers workqueue with btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Replace fs_info->delayed_workers workqueue with > btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Replace fs_info->qgroup_rescan_worker workqueue with > btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Replace fs_info->scrub_* workqueue with btrfs_workqueue. > btrfs: Cleanup the old btrfs_worker.
One comment to all patches: please try to stick to the kernel coding style, you're changing code that will hopefully stay untouched for a long time, please get the formatting right from the beginning. - comment formatting - blank line after declaration block The patches need functional review, I'm not happy to point out such things, but please understand that it distracts (and sometimes hurts eyes) during review. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
