On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferro...@gmail.com> wrote: > SuSE may have an old version of btrfs-progs then (which wouldn't surprise > me, it is an 'enterprise' distribution after all), because I haven't seen > this on anything since 3.16.
Well OK I kinda like the "old" name SuSE since that was the name I was using back when I was on 9.3, but actually I'm running openSUSE Tumbleweed. See: $ btrfs --version Btrfs v3.17+20141103 I suppose Tumbleweed should be short and clear enough for my future usage. > Also, for future reference, you can use the switch -mprofiles=single to just > balance out those chunks. Wow, thanks, that returned quickly. (Thankfully I did btrfs bal from a separate terminal can rather than ^C.) BTW I thought you had unintentionally (for brevity) omitted the -sprofiles=single and I gave it but it complained saying: Refusing to explicitly operate on system chunks. Pass --force if you really want to do that. So I did give --force. (Is it the same as -f?) I hope that was OK? -- Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
