On 2014-12-04 09:25, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
<ahferro...@gmail.com> wrote:
SuSE may have an old version of btrfs-progs then (which wouldn't surprise
me, it is an 'enterprise' distribution after all), because I haven't seen
this on anything since 3.16.

Well OK I kinda like the "old" name SuSE since that was the name I was
using back when I was on 9.3, but actually I'm running openSUSE
Tumbleweed. See:

$ btrfs --version
Btrfs v3.17+20141103

I suppose Tumbleweed should be short and clear enough for my future usage.

Also, for future reference, you can use the switch -mprofiles=single to just
balance out those chunks.

Wow, thanks, that returned quickly. (Thankfully I did btrfs bal from a
separate terminal can rather than ^C.)

BTW I thought you had unintentionally (for brevity) omitted the
-sprofiles=single and I gave it but it complained saying:

Refusing to explicitly operate on system chunks.
Pass --force if you really want to do that.

So I did give --force. (Is it the same as -f?)

I hope that was OK?

Shouldn't be a problem, but unless they have changed the behavior recently specifying a filter for metadata also runs with that filter for system chunks unless you explicitly specify a different filter set for those. The reason for the warning regarding system chunks is that if they get messed up, you pretty much lose everything on the disk.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to