Chris Murphy posted on Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:17:06 -0700 as excerpted: > The problems look different. You're reporting errors 2000. I'm seeing > errors 2001. I'm not sure what the distinction is; but in my case, > cancelling btrfs check and just rerunning it gives different results. > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111841
You likely know this but didn't explicitly state it, and for others... AFAIK, errors is a bitmask, so errors 2001 is the same bitmask error as 2000, plus another, errors 0001. But I'm not sure what errors those actually are, either. The errors bitmask is obviously targeted at devs who can read the code and see what each bit means, and to my knowledge there's no table posted on the wiki or wherever for non-devs to look it up. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
