On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:34:44PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 12:34:07PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > This looks good, but this also brings another side effect, @bctl would
> > also be kept in balance_item which will be used to resume balance in
> > case of crash, so it may see a different bctl->meta.target.
> >
> > So would you please use local varibles for meta.target and data.target?
>
> Okay.
>
> I'm not sure why storing a bogus value that came from userspace and was
> uninitialized there (0 in normal use) would be better, but here we go:
> v2 doesn't overwrite what we got anymore.
>
> Unrelated: I wonder if the profiles in the warning message shouldn't be
> printk'ed as words (akin to ebce0e01), but we don't have a function to do
> that, have we?
Printing human readable strings would be better, you can copy the
missing functions from progs as Lui pointed out.
> @@ -3750,6 +3750,7 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
> struct btrfs_ioctl_balance_args *bargs)
> {
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bctl->fs_info;
> + __u64 meta_target, data_target;
Changed to u64, the __u64 is for kernel/userspace interfaces.
> u64 allowed;
> int mixed = 0;
> int ret;
> @@ -3846,11 +3847,16 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl,
> }
> } while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq));
>
> - if (btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(bctl->meta.target) <
> -
> btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(bctl->data.target)) {
> + /* if we're not converting, the target field is uninitialized */
> + meta_target = (bctl->meta.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) ?
> + bctl->meta.target : fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits;
> + data_target = (bctl->data.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) ?
> + bctl->data.target : fs_info->avail_data_alloc_bits;
> + if (btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(meta_target) <
> + btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(data_target)) {
> btrfs_warn(fs_info,
> "metadata profile 0x%llx has lower redundancy than
> data profile 0x%llx",
> - bctl->meta.target, bctl->data.target);
> + meta_target, data_target);
> }
The patch does not apply to current master, there's
3861 if (bctl->sys.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) {
3862 fs_info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = min(
3863
btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(fs_info),
3864 btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(
3865 bctl->sys.target));
3866 }
3867
followed by the line below, I'll merge that manually but slightly wonder
which branch you have used as a base. No big deal though, I'll add the
patch to the queue. Thanks.
> ret = insert_balance_item(fs_info, bctl);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
