On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 02:43:27PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> The patch does not apply to current master, there's
>
> 3861 if (bctl->sys.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) {
> 3862 fs_info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures = min(
> 3863
> btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(fs_info),
> 3864 btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(
> 3865 bctl->sys.target));
> 3866 }
> 3867
>
> followed by the line below, I'll merge that manually but slightly wonder
> which branch you have used as a base. No big deal though, I'll add the
> patch to the queue. Thanks.
>
> > ret = insert_balance_item(fs_info, bctl);
I had Qu's chunk counting patchset in my tree (and some irrelevant stuff,
like tty patches). But this means there'll be a minor conflict between the
two once you get around to merging Qu's stuff.
It's obvious how they interact; the bogus warning happens with and without
chunk counting.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Meow!
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Collisions shmolisions, let's see them find a collision or second
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ preimage for double rot13!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
