On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Anand Jain <anand.j...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Agreed. IMO degraded-raid1-single-chunk is an accidental feature > caused by [1], which we should revert back, since.. > - balance (to raid1 chunk) may fail if FS is near full > - recovery (to raid1 chunk) will take more writes as compared > to recovery under degraded raid1 chunks The advantage of writing single chunks when degraded, is in the case where a missing device returns (is readded, intact). Catching up that device with the first drive, is a manual but simple invocation of 'btrfs balance start -dconvert=raid1,soft -mconvert=raid1,soft' The alternative is a full balance or full scrub. It's pretty tedious for big arrays. mdadm uses bitmap=internal for any array larger than 100GB for this reason, avoiding full resync. 'btrfs sub find' will list all *added* files since an arbitrarily specified generation; but not deletions. -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
