The fs_mutex has been killed in 2008, a213501153fd66e2 ("Btrfs: Replace
the big fs_mutex with a collection of other locks"), still remembered in
some comments.We don't have any extra needs for locking in the ACL handlers. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> --- fs/btrfs/acl.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/acl.c b/fs/btrfs/acl.c index 1ba49ebe67da..700a3dfd3129 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/acl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/acl.c @@ -65,9 +65,6 @@ struct posix_acl *btrfs_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type) return acl; } -/* - * Needs to be called with fs_mutex held - */ static int __btrfs_set_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type) { @@ -127,11 +124,6 @@ int btrfs_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl *acl, int type) return ret; } -/* - * btrfs_init_acl is already generally called under fs_mutex, so the locking - * stuff has been fixed to work with that. If the locking stuff changes, we - * need to re-evaluate the acl locking stuff. - */ int btrfs_init_acl(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir) { -- 2.16.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
