On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:23:13AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: [...] > rescue=all working without panicing the machine, > and I verified everything by > using btrfs-corrupt-block to corrupt a dev root of a file system. Thanks,
We need to have such testing part of some suite but it depends on the utilities that we don't want to ship by default. Last time we discussed how to make btrfs-corrupt-block or similar available in source form in fstests it was not pretty, like having half of the btrfs-progs sources providing code to read and modify the data structures. So, what if: we have such tests in the btrfs-progs testsuite. As they're potentially dangerous, not run by default, but available for easy setup and test in a VM. The testsuite can be exported into a tarball, with the binaries included. Or simply run it built from git, that works too just needs more dependencies installed. I was thinking about collecting all the stress tests into one place, fstests already has some but my idea is to provide stress testing of btrfs-specific features, more at once. Or require some 3rd party tools and data sources to provide the load. It would be some infrastructure duplication with fstests, but lots of that is already done in btrfs-progs and I'd rather go with some duplication instead of development-time-only testing.
