James wrote:
> -> 2) Returning a type other than the declared value for the return type:
> -> for exaple, the function:
> ->
> -> int foo()
> -> {
> -> float y;
> ->
> -> return y;
> -> }
> ->
> -> would generate an error because it's retuurning type float where an int is
>expected.
> -
> -This won't generate an error (unless your compiler is seriously
> -broken). The return value will be silently converted to an int.
>
> gcc -Wall would point out (and 'fix') this wouldn't it?
No. There's nothing that warrants a warning, or needs to be fixed.
Implicit casts between numeric types are perfectly valid.
--
Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
