Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > still. Beyond that, I don't really use any applications other than
> > XEmacs.
>
> And your favourite compiler/interpreter (at least if you don' t use elisp
> all the time ;->.
OK, I should have said `interactive applications'. Everything else
gets run in a shell-mode buffer, or with M-!, M-x grep, M-x compile
etc.
> And the `info` proggy seems to works well (like emacs info mode at least)
> once you learn to use it ;->...
Except that none of the versions which I've seen recognise the cursor
keys.
> Glynn why don' t you try emacs? Did you ever tried it?
I used to use it before I discovered XEmacs. Ironically, the reason
why I switched to XEmacs was w3-mode, which is one of the packages
which I don't use that much (I use it for reading documentation which
is in HTML format, but not for on-line browsing).
> It' s a bit more efficient according to me. XEmacs is bloated
> instead...
I actually use some of XEmacs' extra features (e.g. inline images in
MIME-email and HTML).
--
Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
