Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote:
I was planning to take a look over the weekend .. but this one looks very promising. Give it a try and let us know !- commit 82d176ba485f2ef049fd303b9e41868667cebbdb gfs_drop_inode as .drop_inode replacing .put_inode. .put_inode was called without holding a lock, but .drop_inode is called under inode_lock held. Might it be a problem?
-- Wendy -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
