On 06/28/2010 12:26 PM, ESGLinux wrote:
2010/6/28 Gordan Bobic <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
On 06/28/2010 11:11 AM, ESGLinux wrote:
Hi All,
I´m going to mount an active-active file server and my first
idea is to
mount a NFS service with luci but now I have the doubt if is it
possible. with luci i have allways mounted Active-Passive
services. So,
my question is that.
Any other aproach to get an Active-Active file Server?
Not with NFS, since NFS has no feature to have multiple
servers/share. But there is no reason you can't connect half of the
clients to the other server.
I haven't realized about it, it could be a solution.
one thing, I have been investigating about it, and I have thought it
could be possible using Linux Virtual Server (administered with
piranha), what do you think about it?
I think you need to start to list your requirements in a coherent manner
first, in terms of performance, features, and redundancy. The solution
you should be looking for will be more obvious then.
If you need client-side multi-homing, GlusterFS can do that.
in this project I only can use red hat certified solutions. I suposse
GlusterFS isn't,
Hmm, personally I find that sticking with only what ships with the
distro to be too limiting as soon as you need to cover a use-case that
isn't very basic and boring. But if you are looking for a "supported"
solution, Gluster Inc. do have support contracts available.
But without more information on your use-case and expected access
patterns, it is impossible to suggest a solution in a particularly
meaningful way.
Gordan
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
