2010/6/28 Gordan Bobic <[email protected]> > On 06/28/2010 12:26 PM, ESGLinux wrote: > >> >> >> 2010/6/28 Gordan Bobic <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> >> On 06/28/2010 11:11 AM, ESGLinux wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I´m going to mount an active-active file server and my first >> idea is to >> mount a NFS service with luci but now I have the doubt if is it >> possible. with luci i have allways mounted Active-Passive >> services. So, >> my question is that. >> >> Any other aproach to get an Active-Active file Server? >> >> >> >> Not with NFS, since NFS has no feature to have multiple >> servers/share. But there is no reason you can't connect half of the >> clients to the other server. >> >> >> I haven't realized about it, it could be a solution. >> >> one thing, I have been investigating about it, and I have thought it >> could be possible using Linux Virtual Server (administered with >> piranha), what do you think about it? >> > > I think you need to start to list your requirements in a coherent manner > first, in terms of performance, features, and redundancy. The solution you > should be looking for will be more obvious then. > >
Hi again, you are right this is a bit confusing (my customer said me: I need a cluster file server, its your problem... :-/ ). Now I´m investigating how to do it. what basically I need is: I need to access the files in HA and it must be scalable. If the load is a problem I could be able to add another node to solve the load problem, (so I thought in a Active-active, because with Active-Pasive only there is one node active so the load problem is still there) > > If you need client-side multi-homing, GlusterFS can do that. >> >> >> in this project I only can use red hat certified solutions. I suposse >> GlusterFS isn't, >> > > Hmm, personally I find that sticking with only what ships with the distro > to be too limiting as soon as you need to cover a use-case that isn't very > basic and boring. But if you are looking for a "supported" solution, Gluster > Inc. do have support contracts available. > > I'll try it in my systems to test it, but I think I can´t use it, :-( > But without more information on your use-case and expected access patterns, > it is impossible to suggest a solution in a particularly meaningful way. > > Gordan > > Thanks Gordan, ESG > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >
-- Linux-cluster mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
