Is this the correct forum for questions like this? Ubuntu 12.04 LTS pacemaker 1.1.10 cman 3.1.7 corosync 1.4.6
One more question: If my cluster has no resources, it seems like it takes 20s for a stopped node to be detected. Is the value really 20s and is it a parameter that can be adjusted? Thanks. Regards. Mark K Vallevand mark.vallev...@unisys.com<mailto:mark.vallev...@unisys.com> Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. From: linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Vallevand, Mark K Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:19 PM To: linux clustering Subject: [Linux-cluster] Alternative to resource monitor polling? Is there an alternative to resource monitor polling to detect a resource failure? If, for example, a resource failure is detected by our own software, could it signal clustering that a resource has failed? Regards. Mark K Vallevand mark.vallev...@unisys.com<mailto:mark.vallev...@unisys.com> Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
