Not seeing any response to my signup.  Pretty sure I signed up earlier.  Maybe 
getting spam filtered.


Regards.
Mark K Vallevand   mark.vallev...@unisys.com <mailto:mark.vallev...@unisys.com> 
Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig.

THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY 
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received 
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its 
attachments from all computers.


-----Original Message-----
From: Vallevand, Mark K 
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 03:52 PM
To: linux clustering
Subject: RE: [Linux-cluster] Alternative to resource monitor polling?

Thanks. 


Regards.
Mark K Vallevand   mark.vallev...@unisys.com <mailto:mark.vallev...@unisys.com> 
Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig.

THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY 
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received 
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its 
attachments from all computers.


-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com 
[mailto:linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Digimer
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 02:52 PM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Alternative to resource monitor polling?

I would ask on the Cluster Labs mailing list; Either users or Developers.

digimer

On 15/10/15 03:42 PM, Vallevand, Mark K wrote:
> Is this the correct forum for questions like this?
> 
>  
> 
> Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
> 
> pacemaker 1.1.10
> 
> cman 3.1.7
> 
> corosync 1.4.6
> 
>  
> 
> One more question:
> 
> If my cluster has no resources, it seems like it takes 20s for a stopped
> node to be detected.  Is the value really 20s and is it a parameter that
> can be adjusted?
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards.
> Mark K Vallevand   mark.vallev...@unisys.com
> <mailto:mark.vallev...@unisys.com>
> Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys
> the pig.
> 
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail
> and its attachments from all computers.
> 
> *From:*linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com
> [mailto:linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Vallevand, Mark K
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:19 PM
> *To:* linux clustering
> *Subject:* [Linux-cluster] Alternative to resource monitor polling?
> 
>  
> 
> Is there an alternative to resource monitor polling to detect a resource
> failure?
> 
> If, for example, a resource failure is detected by our own software,
> could it signal clustering that a resource has failed?
> 
>  
> 
> Regards.
> Mark K Vallevand   mark.vallev...@unisys.com
> <mailto:mark.vallev...@unisys.com>
> Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys
> the pig.
> 
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail
> and its attachments from all computers.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?

-- 
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

-- 
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

Reply via email to