Not seeing any response to my signup. Pretty sure I signed up earlier. Maybe getting spam filtered.
Regards. Mark K Vallevand mark.vallev...@unisys.com <mailto:mark.vallev...@unisys.com> Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. -----Original Message----- From: Vallevand, Mark K Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 03:52 PM To: linux clustering Subject: RE: [Linux-cluster] Alternative to resource monitor polling? Thanks. Regards. Mark K Vallevand mark.vallev...@unisys.com <mailto:mark.vallev...@unisys.com> Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. -----Original Message----- From: linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Digimer Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 02:52 PM To: linux clustering Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Alternative to resource monitor polling? I would ask on the Cluster Labs mailing list; Either users or Developers. digimer On 15/10/15 03:42 PM, Vallevand, Mark K wrote: > Is this the correct forum for questions like this? > > > > Ubuntu 12.04 LTS > > pacemaker 1.1.10 > > cman 3.1.7 > > corosync 1.4.6 > > > > One more question: > > If my cluster has no resources, it seems like it takes 20s for a stopped > node to be detected. Is the value really 20s and is it a parameter that > can be adjusted? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards. > Mark K Vallevand mark.vallev...@unisys.com > <mailto:mark.vallev...@unisys.com> > Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys > the pig. > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail > and its attachments from all computers. > > *From:*linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com > [mailto:linux-cluster-boun...@redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Vallevand, Mark K > *Sent:* Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:19 PM > *To:* linux clustering > *Subject:* [Linux-cluster] Alternative to resource monitor polling? > > > > Is there an alternative to resource monitor polling to detect a resource > failure? > > If, for example, a resource failure is detected by our own software, > could it signal clustering that a resource has failed? > > > > Regards. > Mark K Vallevand mark.vallev...@unisys.com > <mailto:mark.vallev...@unisys.com> > Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys > the pig. > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail > and its attachments from all computers. > > > -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster