David Safford <saff...@watson.ibm.com> wrote: > David, does this look ok to you? If so, I will do two patches, one to > fix the helper name throughout the existing tpm.c, and then a new > version of the tpm_send patch which uses the new name.
I prefer my suggestion: Wrapping the module_put() up so that you don't see it directly. Then you don't need to alter tpm_chip_find_get(). I'll argue that you don't need to know how tpm_chips are got/put, except in the code that wraps it. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
