On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.hengli.com.au> wrote:
>> latency, maybe(?) high throughput or so). Thus, I designed this >> benchmark with a use-case in mind, i.e., a TLS or DTLS tunnel >> executing in a system with such an accelerator. There might be other >> benchmarks with other use cases in mind, but I haven't seen any. > Putting TLS data-path in user-space is always going to be less > than optimal, especially with hardware crypto offload, since you'll > be crossing the user-space/kernel boundary multiple times. Indeed but today that's what we have in some systems. User-space TLS implementations (GnuTLS and OpenSSL) and kernel-space crypto offloading. The purpose of the /dev/crypto and AF_ALG interfaces is to connect those together. It would be interesting to have a partial kernel-space TLS implementation but I don't know whether such a thing could ever make it to kernel. regards, Nikos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
