On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:40:12PM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote: > > >How about adding a flag to all these internal algorithms and then > >change crypto_alg_mod_lookup to disable that flag by default? > > The issue with flags is the following: first we have to think about > whether we want a black list or white list approach. Your suggestion > implies a black list. Black lists for ensuring security is not good IMHO > as it has a tendency to miss cases. This especially applies to this area > where we have already an indicator for internal ciphers: the prio is so > low that it will never ever be selected based on the name. Now, adding a > flag means that we mark such an internal cipher twice.
Huh? Using prio is already a black list. In any case abusing the priority field like this is not acceptable, especially when the priority can be set from user-space. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
