Hi Herbert,
On 4 December 2015 at 15:28, Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborow...@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> +static inline struct crypto_akcipher *crypto_spawn_akcipher(
>> + struct crypto_akcipher_spawn *spawn)
>> +{
>> + return crypto_spawn_tfm2(&spawn->base);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void crypto_drop_akcipher(struct crypto_akcipher_spawn *spawn)
>> +{
>> + crypto_drop_spawn(&spawn->base);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline struct akcipher_alg *crypto_spawn_akcipher_alg(
>> + struct crypto_akcipher_spawn *spawn)
>> +{
>> + return container_of(spawn->base.alg, struct akcipher_alg, base);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline struct crypto_akcipher *crypto_spawn_akcipher(
>> + struct crypto_akcipher_spawn *spawn)
>> +{
>> + return crypto_spawn_tfm2(&spawn->base);
>> +}
>
> You're defining crypto_spawn_akcipher twice. This also means that
> you didn't even bother compiling it.
The chunk that removed crypto_spawn_akcipher ended up in patch 4/4
because I messed up the rebase, oops. I'll fix this.
I did compile and test.
Best regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
