On 12/15/2015 02:05 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We do an "if (!times)" test later to see if we ran the loop too many
> times, but because it is a postop negate that means times is -1 when we
> exit that way. I have fixed this by changing it from a post op to a
> preop.
>
> Fixes: b3416fb8a2f5 ('crypto: qat - Intel(R) QAT accelengine part of fw
> loader')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> ---
> This means we only loop 9999 times instead of 10000 like before but I
> figure it probably doesn't matter.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_hal.c
> b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_hal.c
> index 45c1739..2b078a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_hal.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_hal.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int qat_hal_wait_cycles(struct
> icp_qat_fw_loader_handle *handle,
>
> qat_hal_rd_ae_csr(handle, ae, PROFILE_COUNT, &base_cnt);
> base_cnt &= 0xffff;
> - while ((int)cycles > elapsed_cycles && times--) {
> + while ((int)cycles > elapsed_cycles && --times) {
> if (chk_inactive)
> qat_hal_rd_ae_csr(handle, ae, ACTIVE_CTX_STATUS, &csr);
>
>
Since the times var is an signed int I think we should rather change the
condition:
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_hal.c
b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_hal.c
index 45c1739..864a5ea 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_hal.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_hal.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int qat_hal_wait_cycles(struct
icp_qat_fw_loader_handle *handle,
if (elapsed_cycles >= 8 && !(csr & (1 << ACS_ABO_BITPOS)))
return 0;
}
- if (!times) {
+ if (!(0 < times)) {
pr_err("QAT: wait_num_cycles time out\n");
return -EFAULT;
}
Pingchao could you test and send a patch please.
Thanks
--
TS
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
