Hi Stephan, > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephan Mueller [mailto:smuel...@chronox.de] > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 7:44 PM > To: Benedetto, Salvatore <salvatore.benede...@intel.com> > Cc: herb...@gondor.apana.org.au; linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Key-agreement Protocol Primitives (KPP) API > > Am Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2016, 08:26:00 schrieb Salvatore Benedetto: > > Hi Salvatore, > > > Hi Herb, > > > > the following patchset introduces a new API for abstracting > > key-agreement protocols such as DH and ECDH. It provides the > > primitives required for implementing the protocol, thus the name KPP > > (Key-agreement Protocol Primitives). > > I just saw that in Linus' tree, a DH implementation popped up at > security/keys/dh.c > > Note, the implementation is also from an Intel developer. > > Would it make sense that both implementations are synced so that we only > have one and that we need to worry about side channels only once? >
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.lsm/27456 As mentioned in the cover letter of that patch, KEYCTL_DH_COMPUTE will be converted to kpp once accepted. Regards, Salvatore -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
