Am Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2016, 17:15:00 schrieb Herbert Xu: Hi Herbert, Tadeusz,
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:07:42AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > > No, it does not: > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > > Well there is no fundamental reason why we can't do it on 32-bit. > Even if we just did the counter increment in C this would still > beat ctr(aes-aesni) by many orders of magnitude. I would think that the performance boost on 64 bit should warrant an official patch set. > > So if you really care about the performance on x86-32 then perhaps > you should send a patch to implement ctr-aes-aesni for it. Maybe Intel can shed some light on this: Tadeusz, can you please help me understand why the ctr-aes-aesni is only defined for 64 bit? Thanks Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
