On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Stephan Mueller <smuel...@chronox.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2016, 14:04:14 CEST schrieb Jani Nikula:
> Hi Jani,
>> The directive parameter is plural functions for a reason - you can
>> specify multiple functions in the same directive. Splitting this to
>> multiple directives causes the header file to be parsed again for each
>> directive.
>> IMO this can be fixed in a follow-up patch. Same for other patches in
>> this series.
> Thank you very much for the hint. I followed the path what the DocBook
> to Sphinx converter generated. I will change it in my patchset, but
> may I suggest that the converter tool (tmplcvt) should be fixed, too?

I don't think it's worth the trouble.

Now it's a straightforward docproc directive to Sphinx kernel-doc
directive extension conversion, with one-to-one mapping. It would be
quite a bit more complicated to gather all of the consecutive directives
together, in a rather quickly hacked up tool which we'll throw away once
all DocBooks have been converted over.

And as I said, I think you can fix this up afterwards too. It's not
broken, it's just a bit slower.


Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to