On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com> wrote: > If you pad the data structure to 64 bits then we can call the version > of siphash that only deals in 64 bit words. Writing a zero in the > padding will be cheaper than dealing with odd lengths in siphash24. On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa <han...@stressinduktion.org> wrote: > What I don't really understand is that the addition of this complexity > actually reduces the performance, as you have to take the "if (left)" > branch during hashing and causes you to make a load_unaligned_zeropad.
Oh, duh, you guys are right. Fixed in my repo [1]. I'll submit the next version in a day or so to let some other comments come in. Thanks again for your reviews. Jason [1] https://git.zx2c4.com/linux-dev/log/?h=siphash -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
