[ Re sending with all recipients this time ... ]

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

>> > Oh, I have to ask, do you really mean "any later version" here and
>> > elsewhere?
>> >
>> > If so, then your MODULE_LICENSE() marking is wrong, please fix that up,
>> > or fix up the license text, I can't take incompatible ones without
>> > getting angry emails from legal people sent to me...
>> >
>> Thanks for noticing this.
>> The copyright + license notice is a boilerplate I got from the powers
>> that be here.
>> I'll consult internally what is the proper action. I don't want to
>> make legal mad either... :-)
> Ok, I'll drop this patch series then, and wait for an updated one with
> this fixed up.

This issue, along with some others pointed by reviewers, are fixed in
v3 of the patch set.

I will be happy if you choose to take it into the staging tree and
will continue to work to cut down the TODO list.


Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker

"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a
situation where the homework eats your dog?"
 -- Jean-Baptiste Queru

Reply via email to