On 03.10.2017 21:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 04:57:43PM +0200, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
>
>>>> [...]
>>>> +static struct ahash_alg algs_sha256[] = {
>>>> +{
>>>> + .init = s5p_hash_init,
>>>> + .update = s5p_hash_update,
>>>> + .final = s5p_hash_final,
>>>> + .finup = s5p_hash_finup,
>>>> + .digest = s5p_hash_digest,
>>>> + .halg.digestsize = SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE,
>>>> + .halg.base = {
>>>> + .cra_name = "sha256",
>>>> + .cra_driver_name = "exynos-sha256",
>>>> + .cra_priority = 100,
>>>> + .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_AHASH |
>>>> + CRYPTO_ALG_KERN_DRIVER_ONLY |
>>>> + CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC |
>>>> + CRYPTO_ALG_NEED_FALLBACK,
>>>> + .cra_blocksize = HASH_BLOCK_SIZE,
>>>> + .cra_ctxsize = sizeof(struct s5p_hash_ctx),
>>>> + .cra_alignmask = SSS_DMA_ALIGN_MASK,
>>>> + .cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
>>>> + .cra_init = s5p_hash_cra_init,
>>>> + .cra_exit = s5p_hash_cra_exit,
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct sss_hash_algs_info exynos_hash_algs_info[] = {
>>>
>>> You have warnings in your code. Please be sure that all compiler,
>>> Smatch, Sparse, checkpatch and coccicheck warnings are fixed.
>>>
>>> ../drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c:1896:34: warning: ‘exynos_hash_algs_info’
>>> defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>>> static struct sss_hash_algs_info exynos_hash_algs_info[] = {
>>>
>>> Probably this should be __maybe_unused.
>>
>> You are right, I did not check this with EXYNOS_HASH disabled, I will
>> rewrite it.
>>
>>> Also this should be const. I do not understand why you have to add one
>>> more static variable (which sticks the driver to only one instance...)
>>> and then modify it during runtime. Everything should be stored in device
>>> state container (s5p_aes_dev) - directly or through some other pointers.
>>
>> There is .registered field which is incremented with each algo register.
>> I can move assignes to fields .import, .export and .statesize into struct.
>> When I tried add const, I got compiler warn:
>> drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c: In function ‘s5p_aes_remove’:
>> drivers/crypto/s5p-sss.c:2397:6: warning: passing argument 1 of
>> ‘crypto_unregister_ahash’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target
>> type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
>> &hash_algs_i[i].algs_list[j]);
>> so it was not designed to be const (in crypto framework).
>> In AES code the alg struct is also static:
>> static struct crypto_alg algs[] = {
>
> The crypto_alg and ahash_alg must indeed stay non-const but
> sss_hash_algs_info is different. You do not pass it to crypto-core.
It was again from omap driver, which has descriptions for omap2, omap4 and
omap5,
but here I over-complicated this. I will just remove it and simplify register
and deregister hash algs.
>
>> What you mean by 'stick the driver to only one instance' ? In Exynos 4412
>> there
>> is only one SecSS block, in some other Exynos there is SlimSS, but it is not
>> the same (it has lower capabilities and other io addresses), so there should
>> not
>> be two s5p_aes_dev drivers loaded at the same time.
>
> Current driver matches hardware in one-to-one so indeed there cannot be
> two s5p_aes_dev devices. However this might change thus almost every
> driver tries to follow the pattern of state-container passed to device
> (e.g. platform_set_drvdata()). With this approach the code is nicely
> encapsulated and usually much easier to review. Globals (or file-scope
> variables) usually makes code more difficult to maintain.
>
> In this driver this is not entirely possible as some crypto-functions do
> not allow passing driver-supplied opaque pointer. But except this case,
> everywhere else the driver should follow common convention - do not use
> static variables.
--
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
