Sorry idiot moment.  Sent that out with our internal markings.
Resending shortly.

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:27:24 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com> wrote:

> This variable was increased and decreased without any protection.
> Result was an occasional misscount and negative wrap around resulting
> in false resource allocation failures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
> Fixes: 2d97591ef43d ("crypto: af_alg - consolidation of duplicate code")
> ---
> The fixes tag is probably not ideal as I'm not 100% sure when this actually
> became a bug.  The code in question was introduced in
> 
> Fixes: e870456d8e7c ("crypto: algif_skcipher - overhaul memory management")
> and related.
> rcvused moved in 
> Fixes: 2d97591ef43d ("crypto: af_alg - consolidation of duplicate code")
> So I have gone with the latter option as that is where it will cleanly apply.
> However, it probably doesn't matter as both are present only in the 4.14
> final kernel.
> 
>  crypto/af_alg.c         | 4 ++--
>  crypto/algif_aead.c     | 2 +-
>  crypto/algif_skcipher.c | 2 +-
>  include/crypto/if_alg.h | 5 +++--
>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/crypto/af_alg.c b/crypto/af_alg.c
> index 8612aa36a3ef..759cfa678c04 100644
> --- a/crypto/af_alg.c
> +++ b/crypto/af_alg.c
> @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ void af_alg_free_areq_sgls(struct af_alg_async_req *areq)
>       unsigned int i;
>  
>       list_for_each_entry_safe(rsgl, tmp, &areq->rsgl_list, list) {
> -             ctx->rcvused -= rsgl->sg_num_bytes;
> +             atomic_sub(rsgl->sg_num_bytes, &ctx->rcvused);
>               af_alg_free_sg(&rsgl->sgl);
>               list_del(&rsgl->list);
>               if (rsgl != &areq->first_rsgl)
> @@ -1173,7 +1173,7 @@ int af_alg_get_rsgl(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr 
> *msg, int flags,
>  
>               areq->last_rsgl = rsgl;
>               len += err;
> -             ctx->rcvused += err;
> +             atomic_add(err, &ctx->rcvused);
>               rsgl->sg_num_bytes = err;
>               iov_iter_advance(&msg->msg_iter, err);
>       }
> diff --git a/crypto/algif_aead.c b/crypto/algif_aead.c
> index db9378a45296..d3da3b0869f5 100644
> --- a/crypto/algif_aead.c
> +++ b/crypto/algif_aead.c
> @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int aead_accept_parent_nokey(void *private, struct 
> sock *sk)
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->tsgl_list);
>       ctx->len = len;
>       ctx->used = 0;
> -     ctx->rcvused = 0;
> +     atomic_set(&ctx->rcvused, 0);
>       ctx->more = 0;
>       ctx->merge = 0;
>       ctx->enc = 0;
> diff --git a/crypto/algif_skcipher.c b/crypto/algif_skcipher.c
> index c7c75ef41952..a5b4898f625a 100644
> --- a/crypto/algif_skcipher.c
> +++ b/crypto/algif_skcipher.c
> @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static int skcipher_accept_parent_nokey(void *private, 
> struct sock *sk)
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->tsgl_list);
>       ctx->len = len;
>       ctx->used = 0;
> -     ctx->rcvused = 0;
> +     atomic_set(&ctx->rcvused, 0);
>       ctx->more = 0;
>       ctx->merge = 0;
>       ctx->enc = 0;
> diff --git a/include/crypto/if_alg.h b/include/crypto/if_alg.h
> index 38d9c5861ed8..f38227a78eae 100644
> --- a/include/crypto/if_alg.h
> +++ b/include/crypto/if_alg.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include <linux/if_alg.h>
>  #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
>  #include <net/sock.h>
>  
>  #include <crypto/aead.h>
> @@ -150,7 +151,7 @@ struct af_alg_ctx {
>       struct crypto_wait wait;
>  
>       size_t used;
> -     size_t rcvused;
> +     atomic_t rcvused;
>  
>       bool more;
>       bool merge;
> @@ -215,7 +216,7 @@ static inline int af_alg_rcvbuf(struct sock *sk)
>       struct af_alg_ctx *ctx = ask->private;
>  
>       return max_t(int, max_t(int, sk->sk_rcvbuf & PAGE_MASK, PAGE_SIZE) -
> -                       ctx->rcvused, 0);
> +                  atomic_read(&ctx->rcvused), 0);
>  }
>  
>  /**

Reply via email to