Le 02/03/2018 à 18:27, Horia Geantă a écrit :
On 10/6/2017 4:05 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
[...]
@@ -1778,6 +1814,36 @@ static int common_nonsnoop_hash(struct talitos_edesc 
*edesc,
        if (is_sec1 && from_talitos_ptr_len(&desc->ptr[3], true) == 0)
                talitos_handle_buggy_hash(ctx, edesc, &desc->ptr[3]);
+ if (is_sec1 && req_ctx->nbuf && length) {
+               struct talitos_desc *desc2 = desc + 1;
+               dma_addr_t next_desc;
[...]
+               next_desc = dma_map_single(dev, &desc2->hdr1, TALITOS_DESC_SIZE,
+                                          DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+               desc->next_desc = cpu_to_be32(next_desc);
Where is desc->next_desc initialized for the !is_sec1 case?
Memory allocation is done using kmalloc(), and since desc->next_desc is checked
in some cases also for SEC 2.x+, it should be initialized to 0.

See https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.16-rc3/source/drivers/crypto/talitos.c#L1411

        edesc = kmalloc(alloc_len, GFP_DMA | flags);
        if (!edesc) {
                dev_err(dev, "could not allocate edescriptor\n");
                err = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
                goto error_sg;
        }
        memset(&edesc->desc, 0, sizeof(edesc->desc));


Christophe

Reply via email to