On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:50 PM Jakub Kicinski <k...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 May 2020 16:26:36 +0000 Pooja Trivedi wrote:
> > In pure sw ktls(AES-NI), -EAGAIN from tcp layer (do_tcp_sendpages for
> > encrypted record) gets treated as error, subtracts the offset, and
> > returns to application. Because of this, application sends data from
> > subtracted offset, which leads to data integrity issue. Since record is
> > already encrypted, ktls module marks it as partially sent and pushes the
> > packet to tcp layer in the following iterations (either from bottom half
> > or when pushing next chunk). So returning success in case of EAGAIN
> > will fix the issue.
> >
> > Fixes: a42055e8d2c3 ("net/tls: Add support for async encryption")
> > Signed-off-by: Pooja Trivedi <pooja.triv...@stackpath.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Mallesham Jatharkonda
> > <mallesham.jatharko...@oneconvergence.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Josh Tway <josh.t...@stackpath.com>
>
> This looks reasonable, I think. Next time user space calls if no new
> buffer space was made available it will get a -EAGAIN, right?
>
Yes, this fix should only affect encrypted record. Plain text calls from
user space should be unaffected.
>
> Two questions - is there any particular application or use case that
> runs into this?
>
We are running into this case when we hit our kTLS-enabled homegrown
webserver with a 'pipeline' test tool, also homegrown. The issue basically
happens whenever the send buffer on the server gets full and TCP layer
returns EAGAIN when attempting to TX the encrypted record. In fact, we
are also able to reproduce the issue by using a simple wget with a large
file, if/when sndbuf fills up.
> Seems a bit surprising to see a patch from Vadim and
> you guys come at the same time.
>
Not familiar with Vadim or her/his patch. Could you please point me to it?
>
> Could you also add test for this bug?
> In tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
>
Sure, yes. Let me look into this.
