On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 03:09:55PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > > I have always assumed that I need aesni instructions to have any chance at > this performing well, > but there are certainly chips out there that don't have aesni, so possibly it > is still worth improving > if it is relatively easy to do so.
What we were discussing is the merit of improving aesni only while still being exposed to aes-generic on the softirq path. This is clearly not acceptable. Improving aes-generic obviously would make sense. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
