I know fetchmail is better to fetch mail. But I saw that it's a bit slower
than Mutt at fetching mails. Mutt just does that very fast,like a mail/second.
But fetchmail takes around 2-3 secs for the same. Hence I prefer mutt.
Anyway,can you be specific on why I shouldn't use mutt to fetch mail?
On 0, Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailed:
> For goodness sake, don't use mutt do fetch mails from POP/IMAP
> servers. I know it is good at it., but still use fetchmail for all the
> fetching part, and let mutt worry only about Maildirs/Mailboxes.
--
With Warm Regards,
___________________________________
| V Suresh |
| |
| Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Web : www16.brinkster.com/vsuresh |
|___________________________________|
| Powered by GNU/Linux 2.2.16 |
|___________________________________|
------------------------------------------------
The mailing list archives are available at
http://lists.linux-india.org/cgi-bin/wilma/linux-delhi
