couple of nits inline and some comments on ordering the patches ;-)
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Alan Tull <at...@opensource.altera.com> wrote:
> This patch adds a minor change in the FPGA Mangager API
> to hold information that is specific to an FPGA image
> file. This change is expected to bring little, if any,
> An FPGA image file will have particulars that affect how the
> image is programmed to the FPGA. One example is that
> current 'flags' currently has one bit which shows whether the
> FPGA image was built for full reconfiguration or partial
> reconfiguration. Another example is timeout values for
> enabling or disabling the bridges in the FPGA. As the
> complexity of the FPGA design increases, the bridges in the
> FPGA may take longer times to enable or disable.
According for the current ordering bridges are not yet defined if we
merge patches in this order?
Not terrible imho, but I thought I'd point it out. Would swapping the
order make sense?
I also think [5/10] should be squashed together with this commit to
make it an atomic change.
Apart from my comments above feel free to add my Acked-by
Thanks for keeping this going,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html