On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> couple of nits inline and some comments on ordering the patches ;-)
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Alan Tull <at...@opensource.altera.com>
> > This patch adds a minor change in the FPGA Mangager API
> > to hold information that is specific to an FPGA image
> > file. This change is expected to bring little, if any,
> > pain.
> > An FPGA image file will have particulars that affect how the
> > image is programmed to the FPGA. One example is that
> > current 'flags' currently has one bit which shows whether the
> > FPGA image was built for full reconfiguration or partial
> > reconfiguration. Another example is timeout values for
> > enabling or disabling the bridges in the FPGA. As the
> > complexity of the FPGA design increases, the bridges in the
> > FPGA may take longer times to enable or disable.
> According for the current ordering bridges are not yet defined if we
> merge patches in this order?
> Not terrible imho, but I thought I'd point it out. Would swapping the
> order make sense?
> I also think [5/10] should be squashed together with this commit to
> make it an atomic change.
So far my bindings and code have gone in separately.
Bindings through Rob and code through Greg KH or Dinh.
> Apart from my comments above feel free to add my Acked-by
> Thanks for keeping this going,
Thanks for all the code reviews!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html